Training with e-learning
methodology of the professionals who work in the field of employment rehabilitation (including the management of the social enterprises)
A - DESCRIPTION OF THE GOOD PRACTICE
A1 - Title in original language
A foglalkozási rehabilitáció területén dolgozó szakemberek képzése e- learning módszerrel.
A2 - Title in English
Training with e-learning methodology of the professionals who work in the field of employment rehabilitation (including the management of the social enterprises)
A3 - Location of GP (national)
Hungary
A4 - Location of GP (regional)
Hungary (It was a national program)
A5 - Economic field of activity
P Education
A6 - Ultimate purpose of GP
To practically facilitate or enable social enterpreneurship
To provide educational opportunities
A7 - Spatial scale
National
A8a - Start date
07.2007
A8b - Anticipated end date (if applicable)
June 2009
A9 - Short description of the GP
Promotion of social inclusion of the disadvantaged people in a way that the social professionals take part in a continuous training which support their work and the employer to enter to the market.
A10 - Key words relating to the GP
training
high number of the attendees
e-learning
mentoring
management, legal and rehabilitation skills
A11 - Objectives of the GP
Training of employees with effective knowledge-transfer methods parallel to work
A12 - Activities that have taken place
Development of training material with info communication tools which is supported self-learning through e-learning platform. Creation of a multipliable program package and test-training
A13 - Achievements of the GP
Acquiring of the e-learning method, development of a renewable program package and test training with 20 persons
B - IMPACT ON SOCIETY AND ECONOMY
B1 - How has the GP impacted on the following?
B1a - Legal/financial exclusion Impacts
not known
Any other comments?
there was just a narrow-scale testing
B1b - Creation or conservation of local employment Impacts
not known
Any other comments?
B1c - Adaptation to new realities
Very positive impacts
Any other comments?
The program provides the latest legal-; rehabilitation- and management knowledge and the employees weren't fall out of work.
B1d - Cross sectoral working Impacts
not known
Any other comments?
B1e - Enablement of social enterpreneurship
Very positive impacts
Any other comments?
Employment organisers and assistants acquired knowledge and practical skills
B1f - Amenities for local people Impacts
not known
Any other comments?
B1g - Educational opportunities
Very positive impacts
Any other comments?
Large masses can be trained with this method at the same time so, that the attendees are not absent from work.
B1h - Crisis response
Very positive impacts
Any other comments?
The program undertook the HR training of the not-functioning or just barely functioning social enterprises which helped their crisis response
B1i - Local financial environment for social enterpreneurs Impacts
not known
Any other comments?
B1j - Local policy environment for social enterpreneurs
Neutral impacts
Any other comments?
Altough the policy ordered this program, it wasn't utiliezed.
B1k - National financial environment for social enterpreneurs
Positive impacts
Any other comments?
Later, the program was extended towards Slovenia
B1l - National policy environment for social enterpreneurs
Very positive impacts
Any other comments?
The social enterprises could acquire useful practical knowledge first time
C - PARTNERSHIPS & GOVERNANCE
C1 - Is the governance of this GP fully inclusive?
Not known
Comments and learning points
C2 - How influential has this GP been on local or national decision makers?
A little influence achieved
Comments and learning points
Unfortunately the compulsory training has ceased by the sectoral leader
C3 - How much partnership work has been involved?
A great deal of partnership working within sector only
Comments and learning points
The partners (social actors, labour office, and training centers) took part in the elaboration of the training materials.
D - PR & TRANSFERABILITY
D1 - Please describe how the GP communicated its experience and success to the public
Through the website of the project owner ontinuously communicated to the public, policy makers as well as the results were disseminated in kick-off and final conferences.
D2 - Please describe how the GP communicated with local or national decision makers?
It wasn't communicated with the local or national decision makers.
D3 - Are there any elements of this project that you think would transfer particularly well to other contexts?
Yes, the e-learning method itself
E - RESOURCES AND SUSTAINABILITY
E1a - Total annual income of GP
2011/12 any income due to the project closure the program was ended in Hungary.
E1b - How is this made up?
any income due to the project closure the program was ended in Hungary.
E1c - Details of human resources
training material developers, IT professionals
E1d - Details of technology
e-learning platform
E1e - Details of financial investment for start-up/early stage
purchase of the e-learning platform for the maintenance period
E1f - Details of external support
involvement of e-learning experts
E2 - If public funding were withdrawn, could the GP continue to exist?
No
F - EXECUTIVE BODY AND CONTACT INFORMATION
F1 - Who set up the GP?
Not-for-profit organisation
F2 - Who runs the GP?
Not-for-profit organisation
F3 - Short description/comments
F4 - Contact
Mariann Magyar
Regionális Szociális Forrásközpont Nonprofit Kft/Regional Social Resource Centre Non-profit Ltd.
9700 Szombathely, 11-es Huszárút 116.
Hungary
Telephone +36/30/3323277
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
www.rszfk.hu
G - SUPPORTING INFORMATION
G1 - Photos
(between 1 & 3)
G2 - E documents
http://www.rszfk.hu/cgi-bin/rszfk/index.cgi?view=ck&tID=563&nID=12159&nyelv=hu
http://koordinator.rszfk.hu/
Training material
G3 - Any other useful information